|
First fullsave disk capacity efficiency
|
First fullsave network efficiency
|
First fullsave disk speed efficiency
|
First fullsave CPU efficiency
|
Subsequent disk capacity efficiency
|
Subsequent network efficiency
|
Subsequent disk speed efficiency
|
Subsequent CPU efficiency
|
Progress report
|
Retention
|
|
Backup.local
|
Good
|
No network load at all, unless using a network filesystem like NFS
|
Good
|
Very CPU intensive
|
Poor - no true incrementals
|
Poor - no true incremetals
|
Poor - all files are read
|
Very CPU intensive
|
Nice - from reblock
|
2 dailies, 2 weeklies, 2 monthlies
|
|
Backup.SRB
|
Good
|
Good
|
About one half to one third as disk bandwidth efficient as Backup.local, Backup.rsync or
Backup.remote
|
Very CPU intensive
|
Poor - no true incrementals
|
Poor - no true incrementals
|
About one half to one third as disk bandwidth efficient as Backup.local, Backup.rsync or
Backup.remote
|
Very CPU intensive
|
Nice - from reblock
|
2 dailies, 2 weeklies, 2 monthlies
|
|
Backup.rsync
|
About half as space efficient as Backup.local, Backup.SRB and Backup.remote
|
About half as network efficient as Backup.SRB and Backup.remote
|
Good
|
Very CPU efficient
|
Quite good - essentially all backups look like a fullsave, but only one copy of a given file is
stored for a given host.
|
Very good - only new files and changed regions of modified files are transmitted
|
Pretty good - only changed files are read
|
Very CPU efficient
|
So so - from rsync
|
User-specified. "--num-to-keep 365" can keep approximately one year (modulo system crashes, etc.) if
you run the script once a day.
|
|
Backup.remote
|
Good
|
Good
|
Good
|
Very CPU intensive
|
Poor - no true incrementals
|
Poor - no true incrementals
|
Poor - all files are read
|
Very CPU intensive
|
Nice - from reblock
|
2 dailies, 2 weeklies, 2 monthlies
|